Type × Sector: 275 sheets pairing a product type with the sector that buys it

When the product has not been chosen yet and the starting point is the sector that buys, these 275 sheets put one product type against the sector that buys it and tell you which merchandise works in that context, with which technique and at which minimum order quantity.

Request a quote

What this matrix contains

This half of the print method and product matrix starts from a different point than the other one. In Method × Type the buyer arrives with the product already decided and looks for the technique; here the buyer arrives with a sector, an occasion or an event and looks for the product. The question is not what can we print, but what works in this context: what the audience of that event will actually use, what the budget of that sector can absorb, and what gets asked for often enough to be worth producing in house.

Each sheet pairs a product type with the sector that buys it, and each pairing answers three variables that decide a real choice. The first is the context of use: an object for a trade show is chosen for durability and visibility, an object for a training session is chosen for quantity and unit price, an object for a customer gift is chosen for perceived value. The second is the minimum threshold: no sector accepts an item that requires a quantity big enough to tie up budget. The third is the technique, which in some sectors is close to mandatory and in others is a free choice.

The sheets also cover the less obvious side: what does not work. An item in the wrong material for the occasion, a shape that does not fit a jacket pocket, a weight that becomes uncomfortable on a two-hour visit. The sector in question often appears in the name of the company that buys, and the variable that decides is almost always time of use: the length of the event, the frequency of the meetings, the time the recipient actually holds the object.

The 275 sheets are grouped by product type, which is the fastest route for anyone coming from a sector: start from what you want to give and look for its version for your context. The combinations that cover the busiest sectors are concentrated in a few groups, and in many cases a single detail sheet serves several sectors at once.

Starting from the sector and arriving at the product

The selection has four steps and it is worth setting them out, because the most common mistake is to skip the second one. The first step is to define the context: which occasion, which moment of the year, which moment in the career of the recipient, how many people, in how many places. The second step is to choose the category of product rather than the single item, because the choice has to be made on the function the object has to perform, for instance carry, write, wear, protect, drink, hold. The third step is to choose the technique, which follows from the material chosen at the second step and from the volume expected. Only the fourth step is about details, colour and personalisation.

The second step is the one that gets skipped most often, and it is the reason so many merchandise programmes fail: the search starts from a specific article, with a model and a colour already in mind, and the price comes afterwards. At that point the primary constraint is wrong, because the price of a specific article depends on its material, its quantity and its number of variants, and not on whether anyone likes it. A specific article that works well in one context and badly in another carries an adaptation cost that no price list shows, and often the article that is right for that context costs less even though it looks less complete.

The third step, the technique, is constrained by the material in a way that needs to be said plainly: not every technique applies to every material, and the choice is made on the pair rather than on the technique alone. The same quantity of fabric screen printed and embroidered has two prices, two lead times and two different outcomes in the wash, and in that case the difference is not about taste but about use. The sheets in this matrix always start from the product and name the technique that fits, with the minimum order quantity and the production lead time, so the comparison is made on like for like data.

The fourth step, the details, is the one that is often tackled first and the one that should not drive the decision. Colour, personalisation, packaging and delivery notes come after the product and technique pair has been defined and validated against the real volume. When the work runs in that order, change requests during production become rare, because the material and the quantity no longer move and only the surface left to personalise is still open.

What changes in practice between the product groups

The largest groups in this matrix are the most requested and they match the items that appear in almost every corporate programme. Mugs and drinkware cover the desk and meeting object, with high volumes and almost no tolerance for print defects, because the object is held in the hand. Fleece, hoodies, t-shirts, polos and jackets cover the clothing range, where the size and the wear matter more than the artwork. Tote bags, backpacks, laptop bags and lanyards cover the transport and event objects, with the lowest technical demand but a strong attention to how long the material lasts.

A second block is made of the low unit cost desk items: notebooks, notepads, pens, bookmarks, pencils, keyrings, magnets, stickers and desk mats. Here the constraint is not the technique but the sales model: for a small total amount, the preparation cost of each item weighs more than the unit price, and the number of variants has to go to the minimum. A third block covers the technology items, power banks, USB sticks, wireless chargers, headphones and speakers, where the selection moves to technical requirements, batteries and compliance, and the decoration becomes secondary to the conformity of the product.

A fourth block is the one most tightly bound to a sector and holds the items that exist for a specific occasion: bar and cocktail mats, name badges, premium pen cases, event USB sticks, festival bands, flags, banners, balloons, textiles for the day, bandanas and caps. Here the question is not what is nice but what the occasion requires: an object that is worn, an object that is displayed, an object that is held. The sheets in these groups are the most useful for anyone running an event, because they describe the object in the context where it will be used.

A fifth block collects the products that carry a corporate or affiliate identity, where the choice of material says something about the brand: premium pens, leather cases, metal keyrings, stone mats, cosmetic vials, jewellery and medals. Here the guiding criterion is not volume, the technique is almost always printing or engraving, and the reasoning is about perceived value. The same object in a fine material and in an ordinary material is not perceived in the same way, and the difference in unit cost is often smaller than the difference in perceived value.

Who receives the object in the sector, and at what quality

Inside one sector the audience is rarely uniform, and a decision covers several groups at once. Customers, prospects, partners, speakers, employees and families receive different things under different rules, and mixing them up is expensive. The object for a customer works on impression and recognition, and it is chosen for looks and for how long it lasts. The object for an employee works on belonging, and it is chosen for comfort, for care and for price, because it is used every day. The object for a stand works on the flow of visitors, and there what counts is visibility from a distance and resistance to a day of people handling it, while the unit price barely matters on a small run.

The second level of difference is how the object is used. In one programme the item is picked up and carried away, in another it stays on a table or on a stand, in a third it is worn for months. An item held in the hand for fifteen minutes tolerates scratches and looks shabby once rubbed, while something that stays on a table and is looked at needs a different quality of surface. This variable explains why the same product type leads to different material choices in different programmes, and it is the first thing to put on the table at the first meeting, because it sets the budget before prices are discussed.

The third level is the moment of handover. A handout at the end of a talk lasts ten minutes, a stand runs all day, a welcome kit is opened at home within a month, and an annual gift is handed over in December when the person already has everything. That gives different requirements for packaging, instructions and durability: what is handed out in thirty seconds has to be understandable without explanation and must not take much room in a bag, while what stays on a shelf has to be tidy in its packaging and pleasant to keep. We always ask the client to describe how the object will be handed over and what happens to it afterwards, and those two answers change the choice of item more than any list of design wishes.

The fourth level is repeatability. A sector that buys once a year can afford a single unusual piece, a sector that buys every month has to look at the cost of ownership: how the object looks after twenty handouts, whether it is needed in several sizes, whether it can be replaced one at a time. Recurring purchases almost always win through standardisation: the same item in three base colours, one format, one size, one packaging. Everything else enters as an exception and is charged separately, and this rule keeps the programme inside its budget in the second and third year, when the initial enthusiasm has gone and the costs have stayed.

Budget per person and budget per unit

In sector programmes the budget is calculated in two ways, and the confusion between them produces the longest email threads. The budget per unit answers the question of what the item costs, and it is useful for choosing the item. The budget per person answers the question of what the whole reach costs, and it is the one that decides which programme is possible at all. The same kit can cost four hundred euros per person on a small run and ninety on a large one, and it is usually the second figure that decides. The practical way to work is to fix the sum per person and the number of people first, then see which items fit inside it, and only then pick from those the one that works best for the intended use.

The second budget parameter that is almost always missing is the cost of handling and distribution. On top of the sum per unit come packaging, consolidation, delivery to several addresses, storage when the handout is deferred, and the labour of assembling kits when they hold more than one object. In a welcome kit for five hundred people those lines can come to as much as the objects themselves, and that is the case where the right move is to cut the number of lines rather than to hunt for a cheaper item. In the quote we always show these rows in a separate table, so the client sees where the money goes before deciding where to cut.

The third parameter is risk. Some programmes have an exact number of recipients and others have an estimate. In the second case a reserve of ten per cent costs less than a replenishment run of twenty per cent, because the replenishment brings a new preparation, a new approval round and a new delivery window. The opposite mistake, ordering with a reserve of fifty per cent, looks prudent on paper and turns into a warehouse full of goods withdrawn from sale. The normal guidance is plus ten per cent when the number is known and plus twenty when it is estimated, recalculated after the first count.

The fourth parameter is the time profile of the spend. Two programmes with the same annual budget can have very different shapes: one spends a large sum in September before a trade show, the other spreads small sums month by month. For the supplier that means a different load on the lines and different production dates, for the client it means a different cash risk. When we prepare a quote we state which periods the production falls into and when the shipment is expected, and a breakdown like that often turns out to be more useful than a volume discount, because it holds the annual ceiling without loading a single month.

The calendar of the sector and the delivery window

Every sector has its own year, and it is not the accounting year. Trade shows run in spring and autumn, the fiscal and corporate season falls at the start of the year, training programmes are renewed in September, and the peak of retail demand lands between November and December. The rule we settle at the start follows from that: the production calendar has to match the calendar of the sector, not the calendar of purchasing. A programme started in September arrives in time for the winter peak, a programme started in January arrives at that same peak in March, when the shelves are already full, the unit price is higher and the space has already gone.

The second point on the calendar is the length of the production cycle against the interval between two events. If a programme plans two handouts four months apart, the production cycle has to fit inside that gap with room for approvals and logistics. In practice we allow six to eight weeks from artwork approval to shipment for textiles and embroidery, and three to four for pad printing and UV printing, and those are the numbers to check against the handout schedule and not merely against the closing date of the year.

The third point is the seasonality of transport. The weeks before the holidays saturate transport, and delivery times into European capitals grow in December because of access restrictions to the historic centres, and in Italian cities the restrictions on heavy vehicles through the old towns add to that. If the handout is set for the start of December, the transport part of the plan has to be built from the end of November, and knowing that also matters when discounts are discussed, because availability in the month counts for more than price. Every quote states the date the batch is ready, the date of the shipment and the transit time on three separate lines, and that separation removes most of the misunderstandings when a programme is pinned to an event date.

The fourth point is planning the re-orders inside the running year. Orders placed early get a better price and an earlier term, and for a sector on an annual cycle it means that half the annual volume is worth placing before the peak. We recommend splitting the year into two orders: the main one before the peak period and the replenishment after it, with the price locked at the start of the year. The scheme also works in reverse, when a sector cuts its budget in the second half of the year, and it allows the volume to be reduced without losing the price on the part already ordered.

What to measure after the programme

A merchandise programme is rarely assessed at the moment of the handout, and that is a missed opportunity. A month after delivery it is still possible to collect feedback from recipients, to see which items stayed in use and which were thrown away immediately, and to relate that to the choice that was made. That feedback is more useful the following year, when you know exactly which product type held up and which disappeared from bags within a fortnight, and that knowledge corrects the order far better than any recalculation of the unit price.

The second indicator worth fixing is the share of items that reached their intended use. If the programme was meant to be a welcome kit and half the packs stayed in the office unopened, the signal is about the distribution and not about the choice of item, and it is solved by changing the process rather than by replacing the object. In trade show programmes it is worth counting how many items visitors actually took, and comparing that with the expected flow. It is also worth noting which lines were reordered during the year, and that is the most direct signal that the choice was right.

The third indicator is technical and concerns the quality of the delivery: the share of lines accepted without remarks, the number of rework cases and the time taken to clear them. It says nothing about the brand, and it says how well the material was chosen and how precise the specification is. Within a single sector that indicator varies more than you would expect: one product type in one material can give a steady result, while another from the same class can suddenly require twenty per cent returns on colour, and that only shows up on the second or third batch.

The fourth indicator is financial and the most important for the reorder: the final cost per recipient, including packaging, transport and distribution, compared with what was assumed in the budget. A deviation beyond ten per cent almost always has one of three explanations: the number of lines grew, the volume came out below forecast, or customs and transport charges landed on the client on top of the estimate. A figure fixed at the start of the year becomes the basis of the next order, and from the second year the conversation is about improvements rather than about why it cost more.

Minimum quantities, lead times and prices

The minimum order quantity in this matrix depends on the product type and on the technique, and it has to be read together with the number of items the programme includes. A cheap object such as a pen has low thresholds and a unit cost that becomes interesting from one thousand pieces upwards; an object such as a ceramic mug has tighter thresholds, but a stable unit price that makes the programme sustainable even at moderate volumes. The calculation always applies to the whole programme rather than to a single item, because every item that is added brings its own preparation with it.

The price moves through the same four bands as the rest of the catalogue, and the step between the first and the second band is the point where sampling stops being a cost. For a programme built on a single item and a single colour, the move into the second band is sharp and easy to forecast. For a programme with many items, the curve is flatter and has to be read item by item: some product types scale well, others carry a preparation cost that makes them a poor proposition below a certain threshold, and the choice has to be made knowing which of the two effects dominates.

Lead times follow the structure already described in the method matrix, and one addition applies here: the time the object is going to be used enters the planning before it enters the quote. An object for an event on a fixed date has to be available at least two weeks earlier, because the samples need to be approved, and an object for an annual programme has to arrive at a moment when it can be distributed in two rounds without waiting for a restock.

The commercial picture is the usual one: invoicing in euro with twenty-two per cent VAT sent through the electronic invoicing system, a thirty per cent deposit on the first order and payment at thirty days from invoice for clients with a history, with a quarterly review in annual contracts. When a programme is planned in several batches, the price applies to the production batch and the restock pieces are quoted separately at a slightly different price, which is worth fixing in advance so that there is no argument halfway through the programme.

From the product choice to the technique choice

Once the product and the context are fixed, the technique is chosen on the material and on how the object will be used, and the same product and technique pair can give very different results depending on the context. A cap screen printed holds up at an outdoor event and at a street handout; the same cap in a welcome kit programme, where it is kept at home for months, holds up much better with embroidery, and the cost difference is small compared with the cost of reprinting. The sheets in this matrix name the usual technique for each pairing, and the reasons why that technique is the right one.

The second aspect concerns how long the object lasts and therefore the material. An object meant for single use at events of a few days can be very light; an object that has to stay in the hands of recipients for a year has to survive washing, abrasion and daily use, and that holds for clothing as much as for accessories. The choice of material in a sense comes before the choice of technique, because the material is what establishes which techniques remain available.

The third aspect is the preparation of the promotional artwork, which depends on the destination. On fabric and on paper the artwork is prepared as a vector with the text converted to outlines and a resolution of at least three hundred dots per inch at real size; for laser engraving the file has to be closed and drawn around the way the material burns away; for printing on hard surfaces the sample includes a test on the final support, because the colour on plastic and on ceramic never matches what is on screen. Sampling in this context is not a quality control on the finished product, it is the verification that the chosen material accepts the chosen technique.

The fourth aspect is the consistency of the programme over time. If the same object is used at two events four months apart, it is worth keeping the second batch on the same material and the same colour as the first, so that whoever already received the first one recognises it. This requires the material to remain available and the supplier to hold the approved sample, and it is worth agreeing at quote stage, because changing material between batches costs far more than it appears to.

How to write a brief that works

A brief that works answers seven questions and contains almost no design instructions. The context: which occasion, which event, which date, who is present and how many of them. The recipient: customers, prospects, partners, speakers or employees, because that answer drives both the choice of item and the price. The quantity: exact or estimated, and how estimated. The dates: when the object has to be in the recipient's hands, with the sample approval time and the delivery. The budget: the sum per person and the sum per unit, both, because one figure without the other allows nothing to be checked. The materials already chosen, or the ones ruled out for certain. The constraints: cliches, restricted elements, brandbook requirements if there is one, and what must not be done. The name of the person who decides, with the time until which they are reachable for questions. Those seven points are enough to obtain a comparable offer and they fit on one page.

What should not be in a brief is instructions on the artwork without the source file. The line make the logo bigger or use the corporate blue tells the person producing nothing, because it does not say where the logo goes, how much room is left or which tone is expected. Second: a quantity of as many as possible, which without a number makes the offer meaningless, and a client who cannot name a number has not defined the programme yet, so the time is better spent on that question than on ten offers. Third: a single budget without the split per line, which hides the cost of each position and makes the offer impossible to compare. Fourth: a reference to a layout sent without the file: without a vector and without specifications a layout cannot be evaluated, and any figure in such an offer is an invention.

The brief then has a life of its own, and that is its third feature. The supplier's answers do not arrive straight away and almost always contain questions the brief did not answer, because the client did not know about them. Those questions are the most useful part of the reply: they show where the programme is not defined. The work with the sample starts after that, and here the discipline of dates is what counts. Every stage gets a date and every stage has a single owner. Once the deadlines are agreed, every decision is recorded in writing with the approved file attached, otherwise the argument about the version surfaces after the shipment. It is worth fixing up front the deadline beyond which changes to the approved artwork are no longer accepted and any change restarts from a new approval with a new production date. A brief in which these things are written costs less than any single line of the technical specification.

All 275 sheets, grouped by product type

Every entry carries the title of the sheet and leads to the page that describes the pairing in full: materials, contexts of use, minimum order quantity, lead times and prices. If your sector is already known, start from the group that holds the product you have in mind and read the sheets there; if the product is still open, the groups with the largest number of combinations are almost always where to begin.

Acrylic coasters (1)

Aprons (6)

Backpacks (14)

Bags (1)

Balls (1)

Bandanas (1)

Banners (2)

Bar mats (1)

Bath robes (2)

Beanies (1)

Bibs (1)

Blankets (3)

Bluetooth speakers (2)

Bookmarks (2)

Bottles (17)

Bowling shirts (1)

Branded bottles (3)

Branded mugs (1)

Caps (18)

Charity headbands (1)

Coasters (2)

Coats (1)

Cocktail coasters (1)

Coins (1)

Cosmetic tubes (1)

Cravat ties (1)

Cycling jerseys (2)

Eco bags (1)

Festival headbands (1)

Flags (2)

Fleeces (1)

Football shirts (1)

Formal shirts (1)

Headphones (3)

Hoodies (17)

Jackets (14)

Jerseys (1)

Jute totes (1)

Keychains (1)

Lanyards (1)

Laptop bags (1)

Leather coasters (1)

Luggage tags (1)

Luxury pen cases (1)

Luxury pens (4)

Medallions (1)

Medals (2)

Metal name badges (1)

Microfiber towels (1)

Mugs (3)

Newborn bibs (4)

Notebooks (3)

Pencils (1)

Pens (15)

Pet bandanas (1)

Pet collars (1)

Pet tags (1)

Pins (2)

Polos (2)

Power banks (19)

Premium pens (1)

Rugby jerseys (2)

Scarves (1)

Scrubs (1)

Sport bibs (1)

Stickers (1)

Stone coasters (1)

T-shirts (18)

Tape measures (1)

Tees (1)

Towels (4)

Tumblers (7)

Umbrellas (1)

USB drives (17)

Vests (2)

Wireless chargers (17)

Yoga mats (1)

Talk to the team

Send the sector, the occasion and the number of recipients: we propose the product and the technique that suit the context and prepare the sample within forty-eight working hours.